{"id":1911,"date":"2016-08-18T19:09:43","date_gmt":"2016-08-18T19:09:43","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/casfaculty.case.edu\/ross-duffin\/?page_id=1911"},"modified":"2017-02-02T19:54:13","modified_gmt":"2017-02-02T19:54:13","slug":"why-i-hate-vallotti-or-is-it-young-1-1","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/casfaculty.case.edu\/ross-duffin\/why-i-hate-vallotti-or-is-it-young-1-1\/","title":{"rendered":"Why I hate Vallotti (or is it Young?) 1.1"},"content":{"rendered":"

<\/a><\/p>\n

Ross W. Duffin \u2022 Case Western Reserve University<\/b><\/p>\n

Tuning and temperament in music from the Middle Ages to the Baroque Era is a fascinating subject. It can have an enormous effect on the sound of a musical performance but, ironically, is simultaneously complex and easy to ignore.<\/p>\n

In recent years, it has become a “given” that performers wishing to follow principles of historical performance will employ some temperament with an historical pedigree, particularly if they are performing with a keyboard instrument such as a harpsichord. Out of curiosity, I regularly ask performers of Baroque music what temperament they are using and increasingly, to my dismay, the answer is “Vallotti” or “Vallotti\/Young”. Exactly why that should cause me any dismay is the subject of this article.<\/p>\n

It could be argued that what is needed is a full exposition of problems and solutions in using historical temperaments, not a specialized study. I have chosen to focus on what I perceive to be a current problem, however, hoping that the explanations will give readers an understanding of the basic issues along with the specifics of this topic. Words that are highlighted have pop\u2013up definitions available, so help should be only a click away. Some basic explanation is needed first anyway.<\/p>\n

Notes that are higher in pitch vibrate faster than lower notes, and the ratio between those vibrations determines the interval between the notes. Thus, a note vibrating twice as fast as another will sound an octave higher. Without the technology to measure vibrations, even medieval theorists noticed that this pitch relationship applies to string lengths as well: a string half as long as another of the same material and tension sounds an octave higher. We therefore say that the ratio of the octave is 2:1. This is the simplest, least problemmatic interval, and the easiest to tune as well.<\/p>\n

When notes are perfectly in tune with one another according to the harmonic series<\/a><\/span> (the overtones of a musical sound that are present in varying strengths and help to determine its tone color), the interval produced is clean and stable. When the notes are close but not in perfect agreement, there is interference between the respective harmonic series of the two sounds, and that creates a noticeable “beat” or wavering of the interval, most prominently at the lowest conjunction or shared harmonic in both series. (The octave is the easiest interval to tune because its beats are so easy to hear and match to the notes of the interval: the higher note itself belongs to the harmonic series of the lower note so the beats are in unison with the higher note.) The more out of tune the notes are, the faster the beat. As the beats get slower and the sound suddenly becomes tranquil, it is clear that the notes are in tune. Other intervals have beats that are more difficult to relate to the pitches of the interval, so those are harder to tune. But all intervals with notes in some kind of harmonic relationship to one another create beats unless the interval is acoustically pure, or else so far out of tune that we can\u2019t perceive the beats.<\/p>\n

After the octave, the next simple interval is the fifth. Its ratio is 3:2, which means that a fifth is created when one note is vibrating 1 1\/2 times as fast as the other (or with string lengths in a 3:2 proportion). Fifths occur in every triad and therefore in most harmonies from the period in question. It would be nice to be able to use acoustically pure, beatless fifths in performance, but it\u2019s not that simple. The problem is that tuning a series (commonly though in this case inaccurately called a “circle”) of pure fifths<\/a><\/span>, say, up from C to G to D and so on, eventually, you\u2019d expect to arrive back at C again. Unfortunately, when you expect to be arriving back on C with the twelfth fifth in the series, the note you tune with that last pure fifth is actually quite a bit higher than the original C or any octave multiple of it. That difference\u2013about 1\/4 of a semitone\u2013is something we call the Ditonic comma<\/span><\/a> or, perhaps more familiarly, the Pythagorean comma<\/span><\/a> in deference to the Greek theorist\u2019s “discovery” of the harmonic series and the 3:2 proportion of the fifth.<\/p>\n

Thus, pure fifths, which would seem to be desirable, are incompatible with our twelve\u2013note octave. The solution generally used today is to narrow (temper) the fifths by a tiny amount\u20131\/12 of the Pythagorean comma or about 1\/50 of a semitone\u2013so that the comma discrepancy is spread out over the whole series and the fifths really do make a circle. Thus, the C of arrival is in tune with the original one. A byproduct of this system is that all of the semitones in the octave are equal, but the name Equal Temperament (ET)<\/span><\/a> actually comes from the uniform narrowing of all of the fifths. The virtue of ET is that it can be used in any key from C to C# or Cb major with no change in the quality of the chords and no limitation on the use of enharmonic notes like G# and Ab. There is a price to pay, however.<\/p>\n

After the fifth (3:2) and its partner the fourth (4:3)<\/span><\/a>\u2013like Ginger Rogers, doing everything the fifth does only backwards (I don\u2019t know about the high heels)\u2013the next harmonic interval of critical importance is the major third (5:4). In the harmonic series, the major third is a much narrower interval than we\u2019re used to, but its beatless, tranquil quality can be appreciated after a few hearings. Unfortunately, the pure major third (PM3rd)<\/span><\/a> cannot be easily reconciled to a twelve\u2013note octave either: tuning a series of PM3rds up from C (C\u2014E, E\u2014G#, G#\u2014C) produces an octave that is excruciatingly narrow. Neither can the PM3rd and the pure fifth be reconciled in a twelve\u2013note octave. Tuning four pure fifths in series (C\u2014G, G\u2014D, D\u2014A, A\u2014E) produces a C\u2014E third that is much wider than an acoustically pure third, a discrepancy known as the\u00a0syntonic comma<\/span><\/a>. Only by tempering each of the intervening fifths by 1\/4 of the syntonic comma can the resultant third be made pure. Systematically tempering the fifths by this amount is a solution\u2013quarter\u2013comma meantone<\/span><\/a>\u2013that most Renaissance musicians chose, preferring the sweetness of its eight PM3rds, even though the fifths are almost 2 1\/2 times narrower and more dissonant than fifths in ET. This is the cost of a system that favors PM3rds:<\/p>\n

    \n
  1. Fifths so narrow that, especially without the mitigation of the perfectly euphonious thirds, they sound starkly dissonant.<\/li>\n
  2. A limitation on the number of usable chords to those involving only two or three sharps or flats\u2013enough for most Renaissance music but increasingly inadequate for Baroque music.<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

     <\/p>\n

    On the other hand, the cost of the flexible, universally usable system of ET is M3rds that are all equally bad. Quarter\u2013comma fifths are just that: 1\/4 of a syntonic comma narrower than pure fifths. ET M3rds, however, are 2\/3 of a syntonic comma wider than pure! It\u2019s a heavy price to pay for utility, and even though some theorists discussed ET at least from the early 17th century, most musicians elected not to use it, largely because the thirds were so awful and because it was so difficult to tune by ear.<\/p>\n

    So what tuning system did Baroque musicians use?<\/p>\n

    Next ><\/a><\/p>\n

    go to<\/i> 1 | 2<\/a> | 3<\/a> | 4<\/a> | 5<\/a><\/b><\/p>\n

    <\/a><\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/p>\n

    Footnotes
    \n (<\/strong>    Back to Main Text Body<\/a><\/span>)<\/strong><\/p>\n

    1.<\/strong>\u00a0Harmonic series. \u00a0The overtones belonging to any musical sound. \u00a0Ex.: First 10 notes of the C harmonic series.<\/b><\/p>\n

    \"Harmonic_series\"<\/a><\/p>\n

    2.<\/strong>\u00a0Pure 5th<\/strong> – interval with the harmonic ratio 3:2, or 701.95 cents, often rounded to 702c
    \n Cent –\u00a0logarithmic unit for expressing relative pitch, regardless of frequency: 1\/100 of an ET semitone or 1\/1200 of an 8ve<\/p>\n

    3<\/strong>. Ditone<\/strong> -The interval consisting of two major tones = 203.9 x 2 = 407.8 cents, often rounded to 408c, and having the harmonic ratio of 9:8 + 9:8 = 81:64.
    \n Ditonic Comma<\/strong> -The interval by which three Pythagorean ditones exceed one 8ve
    \n Ex:\u00a0<\/strong>(3 x ditone) – 8ve
    \n (3 x 407.8c) \u00a0– \u00a01200c
    \n 1223.4c \u00a0– \u00a0 1200c=23.4c (often rounded to 24c)\u00a0<\/p>\n

    4<\/strong>. Pythagorean Comma <\/strong>–\u00a0The interval by which twelve pure 5ths exceed seven 8ves
    \n Ex. (12 x P5ths) – (7x88vers)
    \n (12 x 701.95c) – (7 x 1200c)
    \n 8423.4c – 8400c = 23.4c (often rounded to 24c)<\/p>\n

    5.<\/strong>\u00a0Equal Temparament –\u00a0<\/strong>One in which all 5ths are tempered by the same amount
    \n 6.<\/strong> Pure 4th\u00a0–\u00a0<\/strong>interval with the harmonic ratio 4:3, or 498.05 cents, often rounded to 498c
    \n 7.<\/strong> Pure M3rd<\/strong> – interval with the harmonic ratio 5:4, or 386.31 cents, often rounded to 386c
    \n 8.<\/strong>\u00a0Syntonic Comma –\u00a0<\/strong>The interval by which four pure 5ths exceed two 8ves and a pure M3rd.
    \n Ex. (4 x P5ths) – ((2 x 8ves) + PM3rd)
    \n (4x 701.95c) – ((2 x 1200c) + 368.3c)
    \n 2807.8c – 2786.3c + 21.5c
    \n 9.<\/strong>\u00a0Meantone Temperament –\u00a0<\/strong>One based on narrowing the 5ths by some fraction of the syntonic comma (resulting in a whole tone exactly half\u2014the mean\u2014of the M3rd)<\/p>\n

    \u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

    <\/a><\/p>\n

    Ross W. Duffin \u2022 Case Western Reserve University<\/b><\/p>\n

    Tuning and temperament in music from the Middle Ages to the Baroque Era is a fascinating subject. It can have an enormous effect on the sound of a musical performance but, ironically, is simultaneously complex and easy to ignore.<\/p>\n

    In recent years, it has become a “given” that performers wishing to follow principles of historical performance will employ some temperament with an historical pedigree, particularly if they are performing with a keyboard instrument such as a harpsichord. Out of curiosity, I regularly ask performers of Baroque music what temperament they are using and increasingly,<\/p>\n

    Continue reading… Why I hate Vallotti (or is it Young?) 1.1<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":223,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"spay_email":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/casfaculty.case.edu\/ross-duffin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1911"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/casfaculty.case.edu\/ross-duffin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/casfaculty.case.edu\/ross-duffin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/casfaculty.case.edu\/ross-duffin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/223"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/casfaculty.case.edu\/ross-duffin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1911"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/casfaculty.case.edu\/ross-duffin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1911\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2780,"href":"https:\/\/casfaculty.case.edu\/ross-duffin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1911\/revisions\/2780"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/casfaculty.case.edu\/ross-duffin\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1911"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}